jump to navigation

It’s spring. Sing like the birds. March 18, 2009

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , ,
2 comments

My sister and I have been trying to fashion a useful explanation of Twitter. Some very busy but sensible professionals are suddenly hearing that they must get hip to online social networking. They come to us for the what and how, but the most difficult is sometimes “why?”

Part of the difficulty is not all inquisitors have the same references upon which to build. What is Twitter? It’s like a blog, only 140 characters. It’s a chat room. It receives text from your phone. It’s an RSS feed. A party line. Citizens band radio. Email. These labels mean different things to everyone, if they even know them all.

The other part of this difficulty is my refusal to define any tool by only one of its uses. If someone asked me what the automobile was for, I wouldn’t say it was for racing. It gets you to work or the store. It gets the goods to the store. On the way to the store you hear news on the radio, or the kids sing songs in the backseat. And other things happen in back seats when the car is parked!

Likewise, I find it hard to define a tool without including the uglier uses. You can’t fully appreciate the history of the car, and it’s importance to some people, without recognizing that some live in a car. So part of my definition of Twitter recognizes that some use it to spam.

Certain people have trouble with any tool described to do anything for which they already have tools to do. If I told them the automobile was to get them from here to there, they’d tell me, “Well, I can walk or bike. Why should I worry about parking?” (Personally, I very much prefer to walk whenever I can. But that’s neither here nor there.)

Here’s my new pitch. People are all channels. Twitter, email, Facebook, and every new toy we’ll adopt henceforth are just part of a personal communication movement that started before any of us were born. This is at least the why.

To explain. They say that generations who’ve grown up entertained by a creative medium are naturally trained to create for that medium. If you’ve read books you know a bit about what makes good writing. If you’ve grown up with paintings and photography, you can frame the subject in a picture. The generations which have grown up with television and film can generally script a show or movie more naturally than the first generation of movie-makers. It’s not to say such a generation’s TV programming and movies would be better or at all original, but they know what makes a scene and have a warehouse of familiar parts they can piece together.

I can’t tell you which generation first decided each individual must be heard. I believe each generation craves this a little more than its predecessors, because it was tuning in to more and more people’s lives. Before Twitter there were websites, email forwarding, cable access, CB radio, party lines, pamphlets on billboards, one-man shows, and singing to passersby on the street. The tools are new, the signals travel farther, but the momentum has been gaining throughout our history.

This is Twitter, a million people singing their own song. A lot of it is tired and boring, and it just might always be mostly saturated with boring borrowed bits of our lives. Because it’s a system that forces us to broadcast just to listen, because to be heard and to get responses from people who may contribute useful answers, you must maintain your own live signal. It will never be easy to broadcast a life of popular interest.

Some share personal thoughts, but their thoughts are usually common and limited in depth. “I’m doing the dishes.” Heck, strangers are listening. And most people in the world would never share a personal thought of real interest, “My father taught me how to put these dishes away when Parkinsons robbed him of his own faculties. He was three years younger than I am now.”

So what is Twitter? Twitter is a channel through which to broadcast your life and listen to other peoples’ lives. Potentially, we will talk about the groundbreaking work we perform, describe the beautiful places we’ll go, and capture the fleeting moments of introspection we have along the way. Tune in to whomever you wish. Sing along.

Hear my song at http://twitter.com/anthonycloskey

Post no bills, you’re all just overprivileged hacks. December 2, 2008

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , , ,
12 comments

“I work my way backwards using cynicism.”
The Glory of Man – The Minutemen

JoeBehrPalmSprings

Photo Credit: JoeBehrPalmSprings

There was an article on Valleywag today, by Owen Thomas, bemoaning all things Twitter. He takes shots at their business model and management before moving on to the product itself.

This Mickey Mouse operation is the future of news? That’s not the most frightening prospect. Even if Twitter were competently run and profitable, the end result is an unreadable jumble.

Citing the Mubai attacks on Twitter, he claims that user-generated news sources are useless.

Sitting at their desks in the U.S., most people had nothing to add except to observe that Mumbai used to be called Bombay — the kind of message that makes you wish Twitter’s length limit was zero characters, not 140.

In the eyes of any journalist who cites one example and considers only one use for a service, this is damning evidence. Twitter is certainly new and rough water. We do not yet know how to stay afloat or when the winds will change.

As more users join, the Twitter feed becomes filled with more and more noise; repetitive retweetings, back-scratching praise, and self-congratulation. A set of amateurs celebrating each other not for the quality or insight of their reporting, but its brevity, swiftness, and modish form of delivery.

Right now it is an echo chamber. Though people are searching every day to use it more productively, it is somewhat a luxury and hobby. Twitter is some part Citizens’ band radio, some community bulletin board, and some ticker tape. Because the tool mostly appeals to people who like to research and socialize online, that’s what they talk about.

I’ve recently pondered if the discipline and time it takes to make use of Twitter limit its relevance across social and economic classes. For example, do you know any Twitter users who do not have a college education or at least plans to attend a university? Can anyone not sitting at a computer more than an hour a day make use of the links found in its flood?

The future of microblogging is not clear. Twitter is probably only a gentle trickle compared to the information stream it will become. But be patient with it and it’s users, they are paving the way because it is representative of the future of information. Sitting at our desks, we amateurs are breaking our backs to lay a foundation for you.

Again, I invite you to bring your own thoughts to the table by commenting below. And I want explain up front, that while you may not like attention brought to the haters, these are legitimate symptoms to which they point. The attention these symptoms deserve trump the risk of boosting a naysayer’s ego. This is why I love our little amateur blogs.

The future’s so bright, I gotta wear friends November 30, 2008

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , , , ,
14 comments

I recently had a conversation about personal aggregating tools, like Tumblr. Personally, while I use Facebook and Friendfeed to aggregate friends’ content, I’m not interested in pulling together all of the different kinds of content I post. As I see it, this blog, Twitter, Flickr, Viddler, Delicious, and the growing list, allow me to choose whom sees what. As I want you to see more content, I’ll invite you to do so.

Facebook Friends and Strangers

Facebook in itself, has filters, and I consider this its bread and butter.*

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s vision is focused on developing Facebook as a privacy control platform, where other parties develop the networks or applications for hosting and generating feeds of content. While some still see Facebook as a way to digitally reach out an touch your friends once in a while, Zuckerberg ultimately sees it as the lens through which you see all online content. Such a lens is unique to each online user, base on who they know, how they know them, what kinds of information they elect to receive, and what information their friends elect to share.

This is superior to the aggregation provided in any other network, and they may never catch up. Maybe they don’t even need to try. With one network, Facebook, so long as it welcomes partnership with developers, we can manage by ourselves. Maybe.

So far I’ve been pretty discriminating in my Facebook connections. I decline some friend requests and I do not post a link to my FB profile on any other network. I have assigned my friends to slightly overlapping groups both for privacy and to ensure that they are fed content most relevant to our relationship.

But for me to truly buy into Facebook as my great aggregator they will first have to refine their “networks,” perhaps to something more similar to LinkedIn. Right now the networks I’m in (based on my education and proximity to a city 40 miles south) are rather useless.

As I follow more Twitter accounts more for professional than personal reasons. I’d almost rather hear that LinkedIn were trying to buy Twitter. We can choose to look at Facebook’s recent attempt to purchase Twitter as a clear sign that they recognize that the nimble networks are feeding us the more substantial conversations, professionally. If they ever succeed in this acquisition, I am confident that Facebook will make the proper adjustments before transforming the tool.

By reading this far into the post, you’ve just included yourself in the group perfect for commenting on these thoughts. The floor is yours. I look forward to hearing from you.

Question

Is there a service that works as a univeral “profile manager” across online services?

We can use an Open ID as a personal skeleton key so we have one username and password that works on multiple sites. I want one profile information table that updates my profiles in every one of my accounts automatically. Each time I sign up for a new service I spend time including in the same information I’ve posted on dozens of other sites. Does this already exist?

Footnotes:

* From a recent @blogdesigner Twitter update: “Blog writing tip: Write your most dramatic ideas as one-sentence paragraphs to grab peoples attention as they scan (and they DO SCAN)”

Feed the beast November 24, 2008

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

Facebook is bringing me back in contact with old friends and right away we ask each other about our work. To both understand what their work is really like and to explain what I’m doing, I ask how they are keeping informed in their industry.

“Are you following periodicals in either print or online?”
“Do you subscribe to email newsletters?”
“Do you participate in message boards, conferences, and guilds?”
“Do you use Google Calandars maybe?”

Yes, I’m charming. I know.

Too often the answer for all these questions is “No.” I explain that I’m following a feed of information. It sucks, but we kind of need to get used to it. Then I try to explain feeds, and blogs and bookmarking networks.

Sometimes I’m lucky and we can get into what they don’t like about their company’s information architecture.

But from now on, I may break the ice with this:

Web 2.0 … The Machine is Us/ing Us

Heirarchical data models are already past. Go. Right now, sign up for Delicious and Twitter. Tag everything you can.

Think about your email, which is probably the biggest mess we’ve all compiled. How do you find what we’re looking for? In which file, or *ughhr* files, do we save each new email? Tag your email, and make it findable. Tag your music. Tag your photos. Tag it.

——

I ran into a college freshman today whom I knew was studying something computer related.

“What’s your Twitter account, I’d like to follow you.”

“What’s Twitter?”

—–

A Vision of Students Today

This afternoon a reader of Bricks and Boxes sent us links to these two videos. On Twitter. Thanks bakonbitzz. I am floored that you considered us worthy of such amazing material.

You can follow us on Twitter too. Anthony and Jennie. See you soon.

Today, we are all PittGirl. November 18, 2008

Posted by Jennie Roth in Bricks.
Tags: , ,
5 comments

PittGirl

What is he building in there? November 9, 2008

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

I work for Big Big Design. We, my sister Cindy and I, are a two people firm providing web stuff. Recently I’ve made the jump to get more involved so as to be a better resource to clients.

So far this includes Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Plurk. Each has it’s use, and I’m not convinced I’ll use any applications to automatically cross-post to them. Facebook is for friends and family, and sharing things I don’t necessarily want to share professionally. LinkedIn is a more professioanal profile and network. Twitter is a conversation to keep an ear to lastest happenings and tools in both arenas. And finally Plurk is a lounge with for a very small circle of friends. (Growing that circle will be too much chatter for me to follow.) So far so good.

But I want a more public home base for “Anthony Closkey, the dude from Big Big Design.” The me you meet at happy hour where I tell you about new ways to more substantially connect with customers and peers, and about the really cool things I heard in a podcast on the walk over. Here I’m publicly branding myself as a product offered by Big Big Design.

And so here we are, a web presence complete with a blog where I’ll post some ideas born of friends and findings and some other stuff I like.

This brings us to Bricks & Boxes, the domain I bought a little while back. (I reserve the right to suddenly change to Brick Sandboxes.) At the time I was looking to build digital gizmos to post. Collage and html gadgets, all really silly and trivial but hopefully cool. Little web sketches, if you will, in the spirit of Joseph Cornell. I still hope to do these, but we won’t post them exclusively.

Joseph Cornell - Soap Bubble Set - Photo from WebMuseum.com

Soap Bubble Set - from WebMuseum

Into great whatever-you-make-it November 9, 2008

Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

I’ve now jumped into Twitter (@anthonycloskey) and Plurk. So far it’s a lot to follow, but to me it is important to keep an ear to what’s happening. I follow sites in my feed reader and that in itself is overwhelming. In just a few days on Twitter I’ve found brilliant articles and another handful of sites I want to follow. More overwhelming? Yes. But I wasn’t finding this important stuff without it, right?

Don’t blame the messenger. It’s my job to navigate the massive cloud of feed. There are tools to help with the tools. Check out Twitip for an ongoing examination.

With the gentlest irony I share Into Great Silence.

This is a fine synopsis. It’s a documentary about the Grande Chartreuse monastary in the French Alps. These silent monks, it’s a lot of movie without talk, are inspiring. It is a simply magical display of discepline, ritual, and the power of prayer. It is also visually stunning.