It’s spring. Sing like the birds. March 18, 2009
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: communication, social media, tools, Twitter
2 comments
My sister and I have been trying to fashion a useful explanation of Twitter. Some very busy but sensible professionals are suddenly hearing that they must get hip to online social networking. They come to us for the what and how, but the most difficult is sometimes “why?”
Part of the difficulty is not all inquisitors have the same references upon which to build. What is Twitter? It’s like a blog, only 140 characters. It’s a chat room. It receives text from your phone. It’s an RSS feed. A party line. Citizens band radio. Email. These labels mean different things to everyone, if they even know them all.
The other part of this difficulty is my refusal to define any tool by only one of its uses. If someone asked me what the automobile was for, I wouldn’t say it was for racing. It gets you to work or the store. It gets the goods to the store. On the way to the store you hear news on the radio, or the kids sing songs in the backseat. And other things happen in back seats when the car is parked!
Likewise, I find it hard to define a tool without including the uglier uses. You can’t fully appreciate the history of the car, and it’s importance to some people, without recognizing that some live in a car. So part of my definition of Twitter recognizes that some use it to spam.
Certain people have trouble with any tool described to do anything for which they already have tools to do. If I told them the automobile was to get them from here to there, they’d tell me, “Well, I can walk or bike. Why should I worry about parking?” (Personally, I very much prefer to walk whenever I can. But that’s neither here nor there.)
Here’s my new pitch. People are all channels. Twitter, email, Facebook, and every new toy we’ll adopt henceforth are just part of a personal communication movement that started before any of us were born. This is at least the why.
To explain. They say that generations who’ve grown up entertained by a creative medium are naturally trained to create for that medium. If you’ve read books you know a bit about what makes good writing. If you’ve grown up with paintings and photography, you can frame the subject in a picture. The generations which have grown up with television and film can generally script a show or movie more naturally than the first generation of movie-makers. It’s not to say such a generation’s TV programming and movies would be better or at all original, but they know what makes a scene and have a warehouse of familiar parts they can piece together.
I can’t tell you which generation first decided each individual must be heard. I believe each generation craves this a little more than its predecessors, because it was tuning in to more and more people’s lives. Before Twitter there were websites, email forwarding, cable access, CB radio, party lines, pamphlets on billboards, one-man shows, and singing to passersby on the street. The tools are new, the signals travel farther, but the momentum has been gaining throughout our history.
This is Twitter, a million people singing their own song. A lot of it is tired and boring, and it just might always be mostly saturated with boring borrowed bits of our lives. Because it’s a system that forces us to broadcast just to listen, because to be heard and to get responses from people who may contribute useful answers, you must maintain your own live signal. It will never be easy to broadcast a life of popular interest.
Some share personal thoughts, but their thoughts are usually common and limited in depth. “I’m doing the dishes.” Heck, strangers are listening. And most people in the world would never share a personal thought of real interest, “My father taught me how to put these dishes away when Parkinsons robbed him of his own faculties. He was three years younger than I am now.”
So what is Twitter? Twitter is a channel through which to broadcast your life and listen to other peoples’ lives. Potentially, we will talk about the groundbreaking work we perform, describe the beautiful places we’ll go, and capture the fleeting moments of introspection we have along the way. Tune in to whomever you wish. Sing along.
Hear my song at http://twitter.com/anthonycloskey
Post no bills, you’re all just overprivileged hacks. December 2, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: journalism, microblogging, Owen Thomas, social media, Twitter
12 comments
“I work my way backwards using cynicism.”
The Glory of Man – The Minutemen
There was an article on Valleywag today, by Owen Thomas, bemoaning all things Twitter. He takes shots at their business model and management before moving on to the product itself.
This Mickey Mouse operation is the future of news? That’s not the most frightening prospect. Even if Twitter were competently run and profitable, the end result is an unreadable jumble.
Citing the Mubai attacks on Twitter, he claims that user-generated news sources are useless.
Sitting at their desks in the U.S., most people had nothing to add except to observe that Mumbai used to be called Bombay — the kind of message that makes you wish Twitter’s length limit was zero characters, not 140.
In the eyes of any journalist who cites one example and considers only one use for a service, this is damning evidence. Twitter is certainly new and rough water. We do not yet know how to stay afloat or when the winds will change.
As more users join, the Twitter feed becomes filled with more and more noise; repetitive retweetings, back-scratching praise, and self-congratulation. A set of amateurs celebrating each other not for the quality or insight of their reporting, but its brevity, swiftness, and modish form of delivery.
Right now it is an echo chamber. Though people are searching every day to use it more productively, it is somewhat a luxury and hobby. Twitter is some part Citizens’ band radio, some community bulletin board, and some ticker tape. Because the tool mostly appeals to people who like to research and socialize online, that’s what they talk about.
I’ve recently pondered if the discipline and time it takes to make use of Twitter limit its relevance across social and economic classes. For example, do you know any Twitter users who do not have a college education or at least plans to attend a university? Can anyone not sitting at a computer more than an hour a day make use of the links found in its flood?
The future of microblogging is not clear. Twitter is probably only a gentle trickle compared to the information stream it will become. But be patient with it and it’s users, they are paving the way because it is representative of the future of information. Sitting at our desks, we amateurs are breaking our backs to lay a foundation for you.
Again, I invite you to bring your own thoughts to the table by commenting below. And I want explain up front, that while you may not like attention brought to the haters, these are legitimate symptoms to which they point. The attention these symptoms deserve trump the risk of boosting a naysayer’s ego. This is why I love our little amateur blogs.
The future’s so bright, I gotta wear friends November 30, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: aggregation, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, privacy, social media, Twitter
14 comments
I recently had a conversation about personal aggregating tools, like Tumblr. Personally, while I use Facebook and Friendfeed to aggregate friends’ content, I’m not interested in pulling together all of the different kinds of content I post. As I see it, this blog, Twitter, Flickr, Viddler, Delicious, and the growing list, allow me to choose whom sees what. As I want you to see more content, I’ll invite you to do so.
Facebook Friends and Strangers
Facebook in itself, has filters, and I consider this its bread and butter.*
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s vision is focused on developing Facebook as a privacy control platform, where other parties develop the networks or applications for hosting and generating feeds of content. While some still see Facebook as a way to digitally reach out an touch your friends once in a while, Zuckerberg ultimately sees it as the lens through which you see all online content. Such a lens is unique to each online user, base on who they know, how they know them, what kinds of information they elect to receive, and what information their friends elect to share.
This is superior to the aggregation provided in any other network, and they may never catch up. Maybe they don’t even need to try. With one network, Facebook, so long as it welcomes partnership with developers, we can manage by ourselves. Maybe.
So far I’ve been pretty discriminating in my Facebook connections. I decline some friend requests and I do not post a link to my FB profile on any other network. I have assigned my friends to slightly overlapping groups both for privacy and to ensure that they are fed content most relevant to our relationship.
But for me to truly buy into Facebook as my great aggregator they will first have to refine their “networks,” perhaps to something more similar to LinkedIn. Right now the networks I’m in (based on my education and proximity to a city 40 miles south) are rather useless.
As I follow more Twitter accounts more for professional than personal reasons. I’d almost rather hear that LinkedIn were trying to buy Twitter. We can choose to look at Facebook’s recent attempt to purchase Twitter as a clear sign that they recognize that the nimble networks are feeding us the more substantial conversations, professionally. If they ever succeed in this acquisition, I am confident that Facebook will make the proper adjustments before transforming the tool.
—
By reading this far into the post, you’ve just included yourself in the group perfect for commenting on these thoughts. The floor is yours. I look forward to hearing from you.
—
Question
Is there a service that works as a univeral “profile manager” across online services?
We can use an Open ID as a personal skeleton key so we have one username and password that works on multiple sites. I want one profile information table that updates my profiles in every one of my accounts automatically. Each time I sign up for a new service I spend time including in the same information I’ve posted on dozens of other sites. Does this already exist?
—
Footnotes:
* From a recent @blogdesigner Twitter update: “Blog writing tip: Write your most dramatic ideas as one-sentence paragraphs to grab peoples attention as they scan (and they DO SCAN)”
More time wasted having my way with your work November 25, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: blogging, indulgence, Mike Seate, Music, PittGirl, print media, social media, time, Video
4 comments
Mike Seate of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review wrote a column today about PittGirl’s recent “retirement.” Bloggers are sure to throw a fit.
He’s right about a few things.
But if I had free time to write, not for profit but just to pass the hours, I’d churn out letters to my elected representatives or to bored, lonely people in the military or behind bars. I wouldn’t waste it promoting my private life or imitating hacks like me.
I hope that our impending information overload does naturally evolve into more productive use of our technological means. God bless us, finally.
But let me tell you Mr. Seate, it’s not blogging or journalism with which you want to take issue. It’s Western Civilization. We indulge in our opinions and time just as we indulge in SUVs, Super Bowl ads, and Hollywood.
Don’t cry to bloggers because they crowd your industry. The Trib must have some pretty amazing resources for you which are not available to bloggers. In your next column, employ them, please.
Perspective roundup …ladies?! November 22, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: comedy, perspective, social media
2 comments
Justin Kownacki shares some observations on PittGirl’s retirement, anonymity in social media, and political correctness. I won’t promise you’ll agree but you should read.
Bob Braughler, at Masters of Gilligan, has a clip of the brilliant comedian Lewis CK on Conan O’Brien, talking about technology’s effect on society. Lewis C.K. (a little SEO there) has been one of the funniest people in the world for a decade, but this may indicate he’s ascending to a whole new stratosphere. “Oh yeah, and what happened next? Did you fly through the air like a bird? Did you participate in the miracle of human flight, you non-contributing zero?”
Demetri Martin is another sharp comedian. I’m more than a little psyched for his upcoming Comedy Central series “Important Things with Demetri Martin.” His perspective, or Findings, graphed on the Large Pad.
“Pillow vs. Pillow = crazy awesome”
November 20, 2008
Posted by Jennie Roth in Bricks.Tags: escape, ignorance, pragmatism, social media, truth
add a comment
Pragmatists consider practical consequences or real effects to be vital components of both meaning and truth.
If this is true, does truth change? Can consequences be decided at the drop of a dime if one person is having a bad day and you come along and rub them the wrong way? Does this make the pieces of truth fall in line?
It is true that things are constantly in motion, constantly changing. Even man made products can not stand the test of time.
An item is created, marketed, sold, put on display, made a fuss over, only to be discarded in weeks, months, or days when an item of greater appeal enters the arena. The discarded item is put in the back of a closet, a trash bag, a dumpster, a landfill, a museum, and forever archived in the media of advertising and history.
Social media adds an interesting twist to this never ending campaign. When will we reach the point of overload of historical content to the point of no return? Does your little one-hit-wonder band fan site that you created back in sixth grade still exist? Where did it go? Some server somewhere is holding those bits of information. Will we find screen prints of it in a museum one day?
Truth crashes into every realm of life. Your co-worker, your friend, your sibling, your love, your content. Are you content with your content? Beyond the implications of truth to your own life, what about the implications to the lives of others? Whether they are close trusted friends or strangers in the night, they feel the ripple effects of your output. You smile at one, ignore the other.
That smile you gave could lead to inspiration for that person to say what they’ve been meaning to say to someone who needed to hear it. That ignorance adds to their corrupt mindset of society as a whole.
Are you constantly working at self-improvement? At the same time, are you constantly working on self-interactions with others? How do you cope with that? Does the truth make sense?
Bricks vs. Boxes, Round 1 November 19, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: Anthony, blogfest, blogfest16, collaboration, Jennie, pghbloggers, social media
1 comment so far
BlogFest is a quarterly social happy hour type thing. People who read each others’ blogs talk, drink, eat, hang out. Always fun. – Cindy, co-founder of Pittsburgh Bloggers
Pghbloggers.org is a social organization dedicated to bringing localbloggers together, online and in person. The Pittsburgh blog community will next meet in person for Blogfest 16.
Blogfest 16 Details
WHAT: Pittsburgh Blogfest 16
WHEN: Friday, November 21st, 2008, 5:30 PM to 9:30 PM and beyond!
WHERE: Finnegan’s Wake (near PNC Park, 20 General Robinson St., North Shore, 412-325-2601), in the Pub Room
WHO: All local bloggers/podcasters (and their friends… feel free to bring some even if they don’t blog!)AND: Ephemera Ephemerae , Inner Bitch, My Brilliant Mistakes, and Have a Good Sandwich.
The scene
Blogfests are always a friendly atmosphere open to anyone, blogger or not. I’ve been to a couple this year though I (Anthony) only started blogging weeks ago. Besides, let’s face it, everyone has a Facebook or Myspace page.
You don’t know about Facebook, Myspace, or any other social media brand? Blogfest is the perfect place to ask around. There are no silly questions, this community is geeked up about getting anyone informed and involved. God bless.
Witness the history
Blogfest 16 will be a big night for Bricks and Boxes. To my memory, I’ve never met Jennie. Thus far we’ve passed like ships in the night.
Jennie and I are going nuts about the collaborative potential of this newborn site. We know we’re clever as shit and we want to do amazing things for you. We’re also smart enough to recognize your input is critical. Be there Friday, keep us on point, and witness the secret historic bonus.
Note: Already have an opinion about B&B? Bring it. Don’t wait for Friday, drop us a note.
We drank cheap plastic wine out of cheap plastic glasses under mesopic light. November 15, 2008
Posted by Anthony Closkey in Boxes.Tags: art, Mattress Factory, Music, Pittsburgh, social media, Video
4 comments
The Mattress Factory invited bloggers and anyone else interested in social media to meet-up in conjunction with the opening of their latest 1414 Gallery exhibit PREDRVIE: After Technology. Anyone pre-registering was admitted free to the art, nice food, and for a while, beer and wine.
PREDRIVE: After Technology features new works by six international artists including Takeshi Murata, Brody Condon, Paper Rad, Gretchen Skogerson, and Antoine Catala that interrogate the “aesthetics of immediacy” produced by these technologies in contemporary art. The exhibition, guest-curated by Melissa Ragona, explores themes of digital effects and dysfunctions, readymade cyber-kitsch, software aesthetics, and the performativity of digital environments in real space.
First, the Mattress Factory is really tops in promotions. In 1999, as an architecture student, I fell in love with the place. During one visit I even signed up as a donor to impress a date. It didn’t last long. I haven’t donated in years, but they politely kept in touch with me. They’re one fine organization and I’m going to see what I can do.
I ended up taking three laps through the exhibit. One solo, one with my sister, and one with the Neills* which declined into hiding in a window away from the herd.
The highlight was sort of meeting a cute volunteer in a friendly hat. I stopped and asked what she was scribbling in her notebook. She told me the Gretchen Skogerson installation inspired some thinking about her own blacklight work. In this piece a curved wall in a windowless room is lit with changing levels of flourescent blacklight. We talked a little shop about low level light and spatial perception.**
Thank you Mattress Factory for your vision and generosity. I hope to step up my participation in Pittsburgh cultural activity.
Here’s Ballboy’s “Avant Garde Music” dovetailing with my experience. WARNING: This guy likes to introduce his song with a long story.
* Neither I nor any Neill really endorse John’s blog. Instead we suggest you visit John’s friend Evan’s blog Swan Fungus.
** Did a little Googling later if you’re intrigued. This “low but not quite dark lighting situation” is called Mesopic vision. “A combination of photopic vision and scotopic vision.” [All courtesy of Wikipedia] In Volume 8, Number 3, Article 14 of the Journal of Vision you’ll find the study “Motion processing at low light levels: Differential effects on the perception of specific motion types.” Finding:
That motion processing is affected by light level in dependence on the spatio-temporal characteristics of a specific motion type. Temporal pooling under rod-dominated vision primarily impairs detection of signals at high velocities and complex velocity discrimination. Deficits occur already at mesopic light levels and do not change when luminance decreases further. Furthermore, we suppose that co-activity of rods and cones as well as rod–cone interaction at mesopic light levels contribute to noisy velocity perception. In particular, the analysis of temporal dynamics, e.g., inherent to biological motion stimuli, seems to be vulnerable to interacting rod–cone vision. Since we manipulated light levels and did not control activity of photoreceptors directly, our conclusions have to remain preliminary. The effects of specific transmission mechanisms on motion perception could be clarified further by stimulating rods or cones selectively. Our results provide valuable clues to specific perceptual constraints at low light levels. They suggest that very early retinal signal processing can have complex effects on the perception of different motion types which is generally considered to rely on cortical areas.
Yeah, it’s a scorcher! From only skimming the article it looked to me that their test was a little similar to Gretchen Skogerson’s installation.


